National hospital rating systems rarely in agreement

National hospital rating systems rarely in agreement

(HealthDay)—National hospital rating systems are rarely in agreement, according to a study published in the March issue of Health Affairs.

J. Matthew Austin, Ph.D., of Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, and colleagues compared four national rating systems to better understand differences in ratings. For each rating system, the authors designated high and low performers, and examined the overlap among rating systems.

The researchers found that no hospital was rated as a high performer by all four systems. Of the 844 hospitals rated as a higher performer by one rating system, only 10 percent were rated as a high performer by any other . The lack of agreement was likely due to the fact that each system uses different rating methods, has a different focus, and emphasizes different measures of performance.

"Although the variety and differences among hospital rating systems may be beneficial to patients, providers, and purchasers, these stakeholders would benefit if rating organizations could agree on standards for transparently reporting key features of their ratings," the authors write.

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Journal information: Health Affairs

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: National hospital rating systems rarely in agreement (2015, March 6) retrieved 28 March 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-03-national-hospital-rarely-agreement.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Guiding stars: The impact of nutrition rating systems on supermarket food sales

3 shares

Feedback to editors