Afatinib shows clinical benefit for lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with common epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations and brain metastases showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response from the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib compared to standard platinum doublet chemotherapy.

More than 25% of with advanced NSCLC experience progression to the brain from their primary lung and this number increases to 44-63% for those NSCLC tumors driven by EGFR mutations. Prognosis is poor and typically ranges for 1-5 months for those with . EGFR TKIs are highly effective therapies for advanced NSCLC driven by EGFR mutations, especially the common mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R point mutations. Even though there are a number of EGFR TKIs approved for first-line therapy of EGFR mutation positive NSCLC, there is a scarcity of prospective data for EGFR TKIs in patients with brain metastases.

An international group of investigators evaluated vs. standard platinum doublet therapy for previously untreated stage IIIB/IV adenocarcinoma patients with confirmed EGFR mutations in two randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trials. LUX-Lung 3 was conducted globally with cisplatin/pemetrexed as the chemotherapy comparator and LUX-Lung 6 was performed in China, South Korea, and Thailand with cisplatin and gemcitabine. Patients with clinically asymptomatic and controlled brain metastases were eligible for inclusion in either study. The primary endpoint was PFS and the key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and patient-reported outcomes.

The overall results from both clinical trials have been published previously and showed that afatinib demonstrated significantly improved PFS, ORR, and patient-reported outcomes compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. Also, afatinib demonstrated, for the first time with an EGFR TKI, improved OS in patients harboring EGFR Del19 mutations, the most common EGFR aberration in NSCLC patients.

In the current analyses published in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), a total of 35 out of 345 (10.1%) randomized patients in LUX-Lung 3 and 46 out of 364 (12.6%) in LUX-Lung 6 had brain metastases present at baseline and the common (Del19 and L858R) EGFR . Pooling the results from both trials together, afatinib, compared to chemotherapy, significantly improved PFS in patients with brain metastases (8.2 vs. 5.4 months; HR, 0.50; p=0.0297) and ORR was remarkably higher with afatinib (73% vs. 25%). The adverse events profile for afatinib in patients with brain metastases was similar to those without brain metastases, with no unexpected safety findings.

The authors commented that, "Given the apparent efficacy of afatinib, it is interesting to speculate how TKIs could potentially become incorporated into current standard treatment regimens for patients with brain metastases. It is possible, for example, that treatment with a first-line TKI in patients with asymptomatic brain metastases could delay the requirement for whole brain radio therapy (WBRT), thereby delaying or preventing exposure to the side effects of cranial irradiation."

More information: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(15)00220-8/abstract

Journal information: Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Provided by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Citation: Afatinib shows clinical benefit for lung cancer patients with brain metastases (2016, January 25) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-01-afatinib-clinical-benefit-lung-cancer.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Afatinib a better choice for EGFR-mutated lung cancer in first-line treatment

7 shares

Feedback to editors