Tumor-selective angiotensin blockers may improve response to cancer immunotherapy

cancer
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A research team led by investigators at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has found that combining a specialized version of an antihypertension drug with immune checkpoint blockers could increase the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies. As described in their report published in PNAS, the combination treatment significantly improved tumor response and survival in several mouse models of breast cancer, one of several types of solid tumor that have resisted the effects of immunotherapy.

"Although immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of some types of cancer, more than 80 percent of have a disease that will not respond to these therapies alone," says co-lead author Vikash P. Chauhan, Ph.D., formerly of the Steele Laboratories of Tumor Biology in the MGH Department of Radiation Oncology and now a postdoctoral fellow at the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT. "Many questions remain about why these patients' tumors do not respond, but our findings point to one potential answer—that the tumor microenvironment can block the entry of T lymphocytes and hinder their function, causing immunotherapies to fail. We show that this type of immunosuppression may be reversed by reprogramming the microenvironment with drugs called angiotensin receptor blockers."

Cells called cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to inhibit antitumor immune responses and other cancer therapies in several ways. They contribute to a buildup of the extracellular matrix made of collagen fibers and hyaluronan that physically blocks the entry of T cells, compresses blood vessels and increases environmental stresses such as low pH and hypoxia—both of which promote the activity of the regulatory T cells that suppress the and increase the expression of immune checkpoint proteins. Immunosuppressive CAFs also secrete factors that increase regulatory T cell activity while preventing the entry of antitumor CD8 T cells.

Other forms of CAFs can enhance the immune response, raising the possibility of reprograming the cells from immunosuppressive to immunostimulatory states. While (ARBs) can reprogram CAFs from an active to a quiescent state, their ability to change the cells' immunomodulatory functions is unknown. In addition, the systemic effects of ARBs, chief among which is reduction in blood pressure, could limit their safe use in cancer therapy.

As a first step in their investigation, the investigators developed a way to deliver ARBs only to the tumor microenvironment. Starting by creating a library of more than 1,000 polymers believed to be sensitive to environmental pH, they identified those that broke down in the acidic, low-pH environment around tumors but remained stable at the higher pH levels found in healthy tissue. They then linked an ARB to the most pH-selective of these polymers, creating a tumor-microenvironment-activated ARB (TMA-ARB).

Experiments utilizing three different mouse models of breast cancer revealed that:

  • TMA-ARBs accumulate in tumors at levels seven times greater than do equal doses of free ARBs and release ARBs into the tumor, with little effect on blood pressure.
  • TMA-ARBs normalize the tumor microenvironment—reducing collagen expression, solid stress and blood vessel compression—more than do free ARBs.
  • TMA-ARBs induce changes in gene expression indicating reversal of immunosuppression and activate immunosupportive pathways in the .
  • Combining TMA-ARBs with immune checkpoint blockers results in greater stimulation of antitumor immune response than either therapy alone.
  • TMA-ARBs improved the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers, leading to significantly improved response in models of primary breast cancer and extended survival in metastatic models.

"Although the new TMA-ARB we developed is not yet clinically available, there are many ARBs in clinical use for hypertension. So it is possible that some can be repurposed in combination with immune checkpoint blockers for cancer therapy," says co-senior author Rakesh K Jain, Ph.D., director of the Steele Laboratories at MGH and the A.W. Cook Professor of Radiation Oncology at Harvard Medical School. "Following up on our earlier work finding that the ARB losartan could improve delivery of chemotherapy to mouse models of breast and pancreatic cancer, colleagues at the MGH have been conducting a clinical trial combining that drug with chemotherapy and radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer, the results of which are expected to be published soon. We're now planning to test ARBs in combination with immune checkpoint blockers and are excited to see whether these preclinical findings will translate into patient care."

Co-senior author Robert Langer, ScD, Koch Institute Professor at MIT, adds, "Given that about one-fourth of human tumors have excessive amount of matrix, TMA-ARBs have the potential to benefit a large number of cancer patients. But the broader potential of the pH-sensitive drug-polymer conjugates we made is also exciting. This library of highly pH-sensitive polymers was tailored for -selective drug delivery, and this work indicates that these materials could be used to enhance many different types of drugs beyond ARBs."

More information: Vikash P. Chauhan el al., "Reprogramming the microenvironment with tumor-selective angiotensin blockers enhances cancer immunotherapy," PNAS (2019). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1819889116

Citation: Tumor-selective angiotensin blockers may improve response to cancer immunotherapy (2019, April 29) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-04-tumor-selective-angiotensin-blockers-response-cancer.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Blocking pro-fibrosis pathway may improve immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

112 shares

Feedback to editors